Saturday, January 5, 2019

Greenburgh Schools Schedule Information Session On Bond Referendum For $114.6 MILLION

In an effort to keep Greenburgh residents and taxpayers informed, we are posting this information. Sadly, Greenburgh School Superintendent Tahira Dupree Chase has met with one civic association, and the leaders of another, to detail her plans to consolidate the Greenburgh School District schools to the Woodlands campus. She has not shared information with residents through mailings, meetings or articles. It seems a bit disingenuous to foist this referendum onto the unknowing in hopes they will vote for it? Or, is her plan to not inform the residents and have only those she feels assured will vote for this come out and cast a ballot in favor of it? 

A referendum held in February can slam the voters and keep them from coming out if the weather turns out to be what February weather usually is. Regardless, it seems a very suspect and disappointing. Also disappointing is that Mr Feiner and his Town Board have just allotted $7,000 toward an East hartsdale Road traffic study for something that hasn't even happened yet and they don't know will be voted through! Their canned response is that they want to be prepared should the vote go through. Actually, if history has taught us anything about referendums in Greenburgh, and it has, this proposal will go through for a number of reasons. Many with school age children in the Greenburgh system, educators, well-off, well-paid residents will buy into the rationale being offered and vote yes. The uninformed, seniors, fixed-income residents and many not involved in politics or school issues may want to vote no, but may not be able to get to the polls at the Woodlands campus. Or, as we believe is the case, will not even know about it!

Several information sessions on the bond referendum for the Greenburgh School Districts proposal, will be voted upon on February 12, 2019, to spend a minimum of $114.6 MILLION to build replacement schools on the current Woodlands campus. School tax increases are being predicted to increase approximately $850 per year for property owners. Well-paid Superintendent Chase has used the analogy of equating this increase to a daily cup of gourmet coffee. Many of our fixed income readers have related to us that they are barely able to pay their taxes now and fear losing their homes should this referendum pass and these increases be instituted.

Consolidation for what purpose remains the unanswered question? To simply say we would have all grades on one campus does not validate the expense or return on this huge investment. To sell two current schools that are either in disrepair or needed repair begs the question why weren’t they maintained to begin with? And, can we expect more of the same should the referendum pass after Dr Chase has moved on? Mr Feiner insisted on letting WestHelp degrade to the point of ruin. He insisted on letting the buildings intentionally deteriorate so such a dismal picture could be painted, ultimately proving the need to destroy them. Also, what of security and threats to the younger children in our ever-burgeoning active shooter world? Somehow the separate locations seems a viable alternative.

The Greenburgh Central schools have a more surmountable problem with education. They are now teaching the Mandarin language from kindergarten through the high school senior class because studies show it’s an up-and-coming language. It used to be that French or Spanish were the two more popular foreign languages to learn. Frankly, after hearing some of these students speak English, the school probably needs to be working on speaking better English than learning others. And, with all of the special programs and remedial classes that are maintained, a fundamental education seems to be absent. Our suggestion to Dr Chase would be instead of trying to apply lipstick to make this proposal look pretty, fix the glaring problems before undertaking such a major expense and cost to the already beleagured taxpayers.

Here is a list of meeting dates that are being scheduled by the Greenburgh School district to discuss the $114.6 million dollar proposed Greenburgh School bond referendum that will take place on February 12th. The school district hopes to sell the Highview and Bailey schools and consolidate the Greenburgh schools into one campus.

To learn more, please plan to attend one or more of these upcoming informational Community Meetings:
◾Tuesday, January 15 - 7 p.m. @ Woodlands Middle/High School
◾Thursday, January 24 - 7 p.m. @ Richard J. Bailey Elementary School
◾Tuesday, January 29 - 7 p.m. @ Highview Elementary School
◾Thursday, January 31 - 7 p.m., @ The Greenburgh Public Library
◾Thursday, February 7 - 7 p.m. @ The Theodore Young Community Center

These meetings may be a little bit too late in the game to give this proposal the scrutiny it deserves. We hope that Dr Chase’s lack of forthcoming information is not how she normally operates. And why are they only on Tuesdays and Thursdays, instead of utilizing other days to accommodate those who work or have child care issues? This should be changed. Finally, she needs to turn the schools she already has around and prove that she has what it takes before selling us a bill of goods that should be expected out of the corner office on Hillside Avenue. Only then will we get A Better Greenburgh.

6 comments:

  1. It is mindboggling how little information the District has provided, and how much of what they have provided is biased.
    1. They cite a study by Cellini, et.al, on the value of school facilities, without bothering to note that the study was done on California schools, which have a VERY limited ability to raise funds AND California law results in other anomalies. The study notes that the results may be different in other states. I hope our students have better reasoning skills that our board.
    2. This is a HUGE bond issue for a school district this size.
    3. Are they assuming they can sell Bailey and Highview at the assessed values? Assessed values for tax-exempt properties are irrelevant numbers. Have they called a broker? Is the Dannon property listed for sale? At what price.
    4. I agree that it is not a good idea for children to change schools so much, but why is there a need to move all to one campus. Could Highview not be saved? Was any consideration to having two K-6 schools, Jackson and Highview, and the JH/HS (which by the way, was built for a much larger student population).
    5. Has any consideration been given to increasing the percent of middle class students in the schools?
    6. The Board notes that the community can use facilities, but they are taking away local facilities like Highview. Everyone would have to drive to use facilities. Does anyone in Greenburgh care about people who live in the Hartsdale area?

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 5. Has any consideration been given to increasing the percent of middle class students in the schools?

    Yes, that is the whole point of this. Invest in the school district, attract more middle class families.

    Does anyone in Greenburgh care about people who live in the Hartsdale area?
    I live in Greenburgh and in Hartsdale. I care about people who live in Hartsdale.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Resident, Has any consideration been given to whether a 3-8 school will appeal to middle class families? I think not. Separate drop off areas and cafeterias do not provide sufficient comfort. Saying that any investment will attract more middle class families does not make it so. Has the board looked at any districts with a 3-8 school? Are there any? The study they cited looks at California schools, which cannot raise budgets.

    So the Hartsdale area will no longer have a community resource, yet the Board proudly announces how the community will have more resources.


    In essence, the board seemed to look at either repairing the existing schools, or their one campus plan. I do not see ANY evidence that a one campus plan is beneficial.

    ReplyDelete
  5. That conversation has been had ad naseum. Needless to say there are some people who won't like any plan that is developed. I personally have no problem with a 3-8 school.

    www.voteyesforgreenburghschools.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. The historically negative bend of this blog is disturbing in it's perpetual fear mongering. My dearest hope is that those drawn here take a moment to review other opinions and that they don't this blog owners screeds as "fact".

    www.voteyesforgreenburghschools.com for those looking.

    ReplyDelete