Thursday, February 24, 2011

Feiner Collaborations Part 2: Killing Business

In Part 1, we highlighted the actions of our deleterious Greenburgh Supervisor, his “Stepford” Board, the Zoning Board, Ernest Tartaglione, owner of Deli Delicious; Charles Pateman the deli's contractor, advisor and fund raising host; Mark Constantine, an attorney working with or representing Pateman and possibly Tartaglione. In fact, we believe the Supervisor may have suggested to Tartaglione that he shutter his deli for dramatic effect to evoke sympathy toward his plight. Let's proceed.

Ernest Tartaglione has owned Deli delicious for many years on the corner of Rt 119 and Old Kensico Road. We're told his parents helped to create the deli back in the day. The three-story Verizon building across two streets away, morphing through it's many corporate iterations, provided a steady clientele for the deli. Also serving food in the immediate area was the Ground Round before it succumbed to a fire. Then the soon to be computer giant CompUSA, moved in and opened for business. They didn’t provide a big lunch crowd. Years later, they met their demise, fading away through Chapter 11. A new and current tenant moved in, Staples, also not generating a big lunch crowd.

Other changes in the area took place as well. Directly across from the deli on Rt 119 is the Apple Farm market and the former luncheonette that is currently the Bagel Emporium Express. Across the street to the east is City Limits. There's also Tuscany, another more upscale deli seemingly thriving. Nearby is Vavaros Deli whose time in the neighborhood is similar to Deli Delicious. Buon Amici, an Italian Restaurant across from Tuscany, has been there for years, apparently doing well. On the north part of Central Avenue is a new 7-11. Farther down Central Avenue near Pathmark, used to be a Quiznos, there is a Friendly's, a Chinese take-out restaurant, a ribs joint, a burrito take-out and Morton Williams, which also provides prepared food, as does Pathmark. Oops, we almost forgot, there's the long-time Italian deli named Dante's next to a Dunkin Donuts. There are numerous food serving establishments in the area, all with several commonalities: no drive-through windows, no Paul Feiner, and they offer delivery.

To the neighborhood's dismay, Central Aveune's Pathmark and the A&P in the Kmart shopping center will be closing. But before they close, you should note they serve prepared food; and let's not forget Appleby's Restaurant several stores down. Up the road from there are three eateries in the LaMandas strip. There's Planet Pizza, and so on. What do they all have in common? The businesses that endure offer free delivery and the ones that don't, close. Coincidence? Maybe.

What might have contributed to Deli Delicious’ decline? Simply, Paul Feiner. That's right, our Supervisor. He has continuously dumped on Fairview and specifically, Fulton Park to the point where businesses can no longer survive there. Twenty years ago, when Feiner seemed concerned about the residents of the Town, the County took over the King's Inn Motel, housing the homeless, along with other less savory constituents. He said and wrote that if the County ever closed the homeless facility down, he would support developing it into a facility for Seniors, rescuing the neighborhood and ultimately, the Town, which was inundated with older residents no longer able to afford the taxes on their life long homes.

Low and behold, the homeless population in Westchester began to decline. The county hired Westhab, a management company specializing in running homeless facilities, claiming they had the expertise and capability to run this type of development and would offer a better run facility with them at the helm. The Fulton Park Civic Association wasn't happy but went along with it. A neighborhood panel was formed to monitor what took place inside. They even gave awards to several neighborhood members for the work they did with their residents. Residents tell ABG they worked on the volunteer board because they were afraid of the element that would live there and what it would do to the neighborhood. Remember the Godfather line? Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

Once the facility was scheduled to close, covert deals between Feiner and the Westhab leaders began. We can’t help wonder if more donations were made to Feiner, the Stepford's and others in the Town? After a deal was struck with Westhab, some in the Fulton Park neighborhood found out that Westhab had plans they would be submitting to the Town to construct a six-story apartment building where three smaller buildings stood. The proposal would utilize the entire .7 acres, eliminating the grassy areas currently in place. There would also be numerous variances and exceptions needed. ABG learned that Feiner and several Board members met with the Fulton Park Neighborhood Association, when Feiner stated, "We may have to find another location for this project." But they didn’t. Feiner knew if he made his Stepford Board the lead agency, he could give Westhab whatever they had previously agreed to.

At some point Feiner decided losing the votes of roughly a hundred and fifty families in the Fulton Park area was a small price to pay for his political career. He started to not only drink the Westhab Kool-Aid, but began serving it. Tartaglione, began helping the neighborhood as his deli and FPNA homes continued to be robbed. We're told the robberies were later proven to have been committed by a few Westhab residents.

Before Tartaglione knew he wanted to add a drive-through window, he began plying certain neighbors with floral deliveries to use for landscaping in their yards in a pseudo show of support for their fight against Westhab. A neighbor overheard him as he tried to coax a deal for himself with Westhab. But he got greedy and they turned him down. When the neighbors found this out, he was suddenly on the outside looking in.

ABG recently received a brief communication from a resident who had run for office. During that time, he attended a fundraiser for another candidate at the home of Chuck Pateman of Irvington. Pateman attempted to persuade him to convince the members of the neighborhood to agree to Ernie's plan for Deli Delicious to add a drive-thru window as well as increase parking. Pateman subsequently phoned him with the same request. The candidate would not agree to the request, stating he did not believe a drive-through window was the answer to Tartaglione's business woes. Pateman agreed, stating he had suggested pizza ovens as a solution, as there were no nearby pizza establishments nearby. He could clean up! 


Tartaglione knows Westhab is anxious to jettison the albatross property originally guaranteed as a slam-dunk by Feiner. Tartaglione knows the clientele from Westhab will not provide the income he desires and is looking to get out. In fact, the neighborhood believes Tartaglione wants the drive-through window so he can offer it to a potential purchaser. And, because the zoning rules won't allow a drive-through window, his window will be grandfathered for them to use. 

We’re sure Feiner keeps telling him not to worry, that he’ll make this right. But Tartaglione really can’t wait for Feiner because there are too many issues that even the Zoning Board couldn’t ignore. Pateman is probably telling him to sell because the deal with Feiner looks shaky. We’re thinking he should take a business management course or two and learn how to better deal with competition, all of whom seem to be doing quite well without Feiner’s help. Strange bedfellows indeed. 

8 comments:

  1. Anyone interested in knowing what really occurred here would be well advised to read the two Citizens Complaints against Nick DeCicco and Jordan Glass that were recently filed with the Town's Board of Ethics. Complete copies of these complaints, with the evidence attached, are available on the Edgemont Community Council's facebook page.

    ReplyDelete
  2. See Part 3.

    “conjecture”
    “imagine”
    “probably”

    Not much facts here, eh?

    The “vote you mention was an informal “straw-poll” on 1/20. Pateman called DeCicco for the first time on 1/24 (4 days later). DeCicco recused himself from the Deli case the NEXT day – 3 weeks prior to the formal vote on 2/17. At the time of the fund raiser on 2/5 DeCicco had already been off the Deli case for 11 days! This has all been VERIFIED by the ZBA Chairman.

    Furthermore, “Ernie” wasn’t event at the fund raiser and the “fantasy” conversations stated are just that – fantasy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nick is one of the most honest & humble people around. He got 46% of the vote despite being a political no-name, a major registration deficit, no time to put a team together or readymade organization to work with!

    That’s not a knock Shimsk but a credit to good young man who took an unpaid leave to walk door to door for a month. It’s horrible what we do to good people especially when it’s clear he was acting in openly at all times.

    Oh – and I’m sure the ECC posted DeCicco’s reply on their facebook page next BB’s complaint – oh wait – they didn’t. Big surprise.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Where does DeCicco come off thinking that as long as he "recused" himself, he's off the hook when it comes to violating the Town's Ethics Laws? Those laws forbid any member of a decision-making board from accepting political contributions from any individual or his or her representative who has an application pending before that board. As a lawyer, DeCicco had to know that when Chuck Pateman, Deli Delicious's representative at the ZBA hearing offered to host a fundraiser for him at his house -- four days after the straw vote before the ZBA on the Deli Delicious application which DeCicco supported -- that his accepting Pateman's offer was strictly forbidden under the Town's Ethics Laws. And telling the ZBA chairman, who was not going to be at the next ZBA meeting that he intended to recuse himself is meaningless gibberish. DeCicco didn't even have the balls to tell his fellow ZBA members what he had done and why he had to recuse himself. DeCicco may have started off as a "good young man" but he's now damaged goods. He can't even find a way to apologize for his disgraceful behavior. What a shame!

    ReplyDelete
  5. had to know” ... Many more assumptions here.

    So it's disgraceful that DeCicco did immediately recuse himself once Pateman called him? And that he refrained from talking to other ZBA members about case since he recused on 1/25? Huh? Sounds like he was acting in good faith at all times.

    Maybe you’d be better calling him incorrect – IF anything – than dishonest. Sound like you have an agenda – like souring a fine young political candidates name who could very well take over the cherished Greenburgh Legislative seat?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Telling the ZBA Chairman is gibberish – really, stop with these conspiracy theories! Besides if you paid attention to the last ZBA meeting DeCicco stated on the record that as part of the conversation with the ZBA Chairman it was said the Chairman would inform the ZBA staff attorney because of some issue his recusal created with quorum – oh well that is before Feiner rushed Glass onto the Board.

    Go after the real culprits here that are STILL trying to push this through, not a good guy that took himself off the matter immediately.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Also... DeCicco statement's on the record at the 2/17 meeting he said he advised member Harrison of his recusal at the same time he advised Chairman Belasco. So, he immediately advised another member (who expressed favor for the application in the straw-poll) AND the Chairman (who express DIS-favor with the application) that he was recused from the case as of 1/25. This is why people hate politics - agenda driven cronies who use half-truths and manipulate facts to inflame the public against otherwise good people.

    ReplyDelete
  8. DeCicco violated the most fundamental Ethics Law Greenburgh has -- the law that makes "pay to play" illegal in Greenburgh. Recusing himself does not excuse the violation; and yes, even if he weren't a lawyer, DeCicco had to know what he was doing was in violation of the Ethics Law, and the fact that he IS a lawyer makes his refusal to admit what he did was wrong all that more troubling. And DeCicco seems not to know that his failure to tell the ZBA chairman the reason for the "recusal" made the quorum issue moot. Had DeCicco told the ZBA chairman the truth, the ZBA chairman would have known that, quorum or no quorum, DeCicco couldn't "abstain." He had to recuse himself. But regardless, he should never have put the ZBA in this embarrassing position in the first place. Most people are forgiving. Maybe if DeCicco would admit what he did was wrong and apologize, people might give him another chance. Because he cannot, he remains a stain on the ZBA who should be replaced at the earliest opportunity.

    ReplyDelete