Thursday, November 23, 2017
Tuesday, November 14, 2017
Why Fix It When We Can Talk About It - Some More
Five years ago, post-tropical Storm Sandy struck at high
tide, driving catastrophic storm surges into coastal New Jersey and New York
unlike anything seen before. Thirty-four New Jersey residents lost their lives.
Hundreds of thousands of homes and businesses were destroyed, causing over $62
billion in damage. Five years later some areas have recovered. Some
have not.
But we don’t live on the coastal area and yet are equally
impacted by storms. Newly re-appointed Town Councilman Sheehan discussed
Hurricane/Tropical Storm Irene and its impact to Greenburgh specifically and
the region in general as a 500-year storm. Sadly, his account was skewed for
those residents and businesses that have suffered with just about every storm.
But how could this 500-year storm happen?
Some say it’s simple. Development and over-development of
our suburban communities has allowed and in Mr Feiner’s case encouraged
over-sized buildings on every speck of undeveloped land. Where it is apropos,
such as the super Stop and Shop on Rt 119 in the Glenview section of the Town
near the Marriot and Sheraton hotels, it is conversely not apropos directly
across the street with Brightview Assisted Living, and their oversized behemoth
sized building smack dab in the middle of residential homes. Similarly, the
proposed apartment building on Dromore Road and/or the Shelborne Assisted Living
facility on Underhill Avenue, the site of the former Sprainbrook Nursery. There
are more examples, but we’re sure you understand the point.
Many community leaders believe super storms are the new
norm, and are increasing efforts to make communities more resilient—a critical
component of all recovery efforts. NOAA points to two examples:
· New Jersey’s Brigantine Island community used the recovery phase as
an opportunity to elevate the road off the island, strengthen barriers along
the oceanfront and bayside, and improve zoning and floodplain ordinances.
· New Jersey’s coastal management program developed
a Getting to Resilience program to help communities
improve hazard preparedness. As a result, many communities instituted new
policies that keep people and infrastructure safer, and also resulted in cost
reductions for flood insurance premiums.
This information, while germane to New Jersey and
possibly other coastal areas, does little to ameliorate the issues for those
Greenburgh residents as well as others who, by proximity to the two major
rivers used by the entire county for drainage, are routinely ignored unless a
news crew is broadcasting from a flood victims home. And, if you read the
various governmental agencies websites, specifically about flooding, they
mention risk and vulnerability assessments, public outreach and engagement,
planning integration, disaster preparedness and recovery and even hazard
mitigation implementation. All of these are things a taxpayer can do after they are flooded and the literal
and figurative damage has been done. Yet, the one real solution is missing.
The Bronx River and the Saw Mill River are the two rivers
that every community within their confines drain into. As more and more
development is squeezed onto any undeveloped property, their storm drainage is
guided to one of those rivers – maybe not directly, but ultimately. Hence, with
more impervious space unable to now absorb previous rain waters, the runoff is
pointed to these two rivers. Ultimately, the lower lying regions that never
used to flood before are now inundated by water. Many of those same residents
have been flooded so many times that they are forced to sell their homes at a
fraction of their original worth. So what’s the solution?
Most flood victims know that FEMA is a pathetic and
bloated bureaucracy that is incapable of helping those already affected by
flooding. Having lived through numerous hurricanes, we’ve watched FEMA shrug
their federal shoulders and walk away from helping those in need. As a
response, Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer sponsored and had passed legislation
to increase FEMA flood insurance premiums to those in newly districted flood
zones. So basically, the people needing help the most get walloped again after
not being helped the first time.
The elections are over. The Democrats claim they came out
and voted against President Trump. The Republicans are utilizing the same
excuse while ignoring the country’s mandate for change by electing President
Trump. Sadly, this is the state of politics in our state, county and
municipalities. All of the newly elected candidates that won promised to “fight
for you” or offered “a new direction.” Really? Not one of them, whether it’s
County Executive-elect George Latimer or any County legislator that has one of
the two rivers in their district will do anything about flooding because those
constituents are too few and far between to be needed for their
election/re-election.
The solution? First, a buy-in from every community. They
need to participate in cleaning out the river in their community on a regular
basis. Second, both rivers need to be dredged and their width and depth increased.
Hopefully, the environmentalists will have more compassion for the taxpaying
residents than the ducks and other limited wildlife in the rivers’ immediate
path. Third, the storm water infrastructure must be upgraded and more
importantly, maintained. Fourth, any new, expanded or additional construction must
incorporate significant drainage solutions from that location that will not add
significantly to the rise of either river during a storm that cannot be
controlled. Fifth, variances, a key tool used by Mr Feiner, his Board and
others, cannot be allowed for the benefit of developers. Finally, the storm
water path to the rivers and the rivers themselves must be allowed to flow
unimpeded. This will reduce flooding, damage, accidents and more. It’s time for
some new leadership to step up and not bail on the river corridors. Only then
will we get A Better Greenburgh.
Saturday, November 11, 2017
Celebrating Our Veterans
Friday, November 10, 2017
When Will Your Property Tax Rebate Check Arrive?
ALBANY – This year’s property tax- rebate checks will start
hitting mailboxes in New York in mid-November, state officials said.
The latest round of checks will be for a portion of
homeowners’ school taxes and average about $179 per household. The tax
department said it will take several months for all 2 million checks to be
issued, so the distribution will run into early 2018.
“The property-tax-relief credit directly reduces your
property tax burden if you are a qualifying homeowner,” the state Department of
Taxation and Finance said on its website.
The checks supplant “property-tax freeze” checks that had
gone out the past three years for the annual increase in school and municipal
taxes.
What will you get?
The program —called the property
tax- relief credit — applies to homeowners with an adjusted gross household
income of $275,000 or less. Also, the local school district had to stay under
the state’s property-tax cap.
Last year, the four-year, $1.3 billion program started with
a flat amount: $185 for upstate residents and $130 downstate. This year it
provides larger checks to homeowners with lower incomes.
Now it’s a rebate based on a percentage of what you get back
each year through STAR, the $3 billion state program that provides a savings on
school taxes.
For those making under $75,000, the rebate will be equal to
28 percent of the STAR savings.
If you get $1,000 a year off your school taxes through STAR,
you would get a check for $280.
The percentage drops for higher incomes: Between $75,000 and
$150,000, the check is for 20.5 percent of the STAR break; and 5.5 percent for
between $200,000 and $275,000.
In the last two years of the program, the checks will get
larger: In 2019, it will get as high as 85 percent back for those earning less
than $75,000.
Senior citizens receive Enhanced STAR, and they will also
get a check: for 12 percent of the STAR rebate, growing to 34 percent in 2019.
What about STAR checks?
The tax-relief checks come
after the tax department last year starting mailing out 195,000 STAR rebates to
new homeowners, which went out as checks for the first time last year.
Those who bought their homes after August 2015 get a STAR
check for the savings on their school taxes, rather than seeing the savings
upfront in their tax bills.
STAR is available on homeowners’ primary residences for
those with incomes of $500,000 or less.
The program struggled last year, but improved this year as
the tax department better adjusted to it.
“Those property owners who have registered should have
received a check or a letter from us at this point,” said tax department
spokesman James Gazzale. “If they have not and if they believe they are
eligible, they can contact us.”
People should have received their check in time to pay their
school taxes, which for most of the state is Sept. 30. Last year, checks
went out late, leaving people struggling to pay their full tax bill.
But tax assessors said the state didn’t have the same
problems this year.
The tax department “should be commended for making this a
priority and fixing what was a broke system they were forced to put into place
in such a short time frame last year,” said Jay Franklin, the tax assessor in
Tompkins County, who was critical of the situation last year.
What do I have to do?
The tax department will
automatically mail the property-tax-relief-credit checks to you.
But be patient, the process will take a few months, and the
state hasn’t said when each area of New York will get them first.
For more information, visit tax.ny.gov/pit/property/propertytax- relief.htm.
If you’re a new homeowner, you should have applied and
received a check for your STAR rebate. That’s if you’re income eligible and if
your school taxes were already due.
To register or for more information, visitwww.tax.ny.gov/pit/property/star /default.htm.
This year it provides larger checks to homeowners with lower
incomes. In the last two years of the program, the checks will get larger: In
2019, it will get as high as 85 percent back for those earning less than
$75,000.
Tuesday, November 7, 2017
Sunday, November 5, 2017
Clarification On A NYS Constitutional Convention (Con-Con)
A lot of people have been discussing the Constitutional
Convention in order to make an educated vote! Here’s our take on both sides of
the issue.
For
– Vote Yes
A Constitutional Convention only comes along once every twenty
years. Many people say it’s the public’s opportunity to change what they don’t
like in the NYS constitution. The attraction of this idea suits those who are
proponents of a constitutional convention, believing the constitution is a
living document. As is typical, there are those who do not believe it to be a
living document.
It is said that potential improvements from a Con-Con could
include a reform of election law, achieve nonpartisan redistricting, setting
term limits and mandating budget-making transparency. A big gripe that many New
Yorkers have against the state is the amount of unfunded mandates New Yorkers
are saddled with as the current crop of politicians cannot seem to stop
themselves from creating a new tax, fee, requirement, statute etc. that someone
mysteriously comes up with, claiming, “It wasn’t me,” but costs us more in
money, businesses, residents fleeing and so on. As everyone is fond of saying,
New Yorkers are voting with their feet and leaving.
If the proponents of “Yes” were to win, it will set off a year
of primary and general election voting to choose Con-Con delegates. There would
be three per state Senate, plus 15 at-large ones. Rest assured that many, if
not all of our current representatives would be actively seeking one of the
positions – the same people who have either put us in this predicament or are
contributing to it!
One aspect is the great pay they would receive in addition to
their existing salary. The other is they would be able to change the
constitution to further allow whatever their own agenda might be. They could
also “gang up” together with other legislators to ensure minimal resistance.
The convention would meet in Albany with an expectation that would either offer
individual amendments or one package with everything lumped into it. Then it
would go to voters in 2019 for either passage or rejection. And, as voters have
proven time and time again, they vote not knowing what both sides of an issue
might be.
Need an example? In 2012 Mr Feiner wanted the GameOn 365 project
to be built against the wishes of the entire neighborhood. He tried to
virtually give them the property on a very favorable lease to only
meet resistance from that neighborhood, civic associations and other residents who
recognized why this was so wrong on so many levels. What did he do? He delayed
everything so he could have a referendum on allowing the proposal. Twenty-two
thousand people in the Town who were not given all the facts, voted to allow
it, superseding the neighborhoods desires. Fortunately, the residents prevailed
on a technicality as foreclosed property has to be sold, not leased; but
the lack of trust was now out in the open. By the way, Mr Feiner will get
relected this Tuesday as the Republicans and other party’s have
abandoned Greenburgh as a democratic stronghold not worth using resources on.
Against
– Vote No
At least $350 million in taxpayer dollars will be spent on a Constitution Convention. Delegates will pocket $80,000 each! Delegates who hold NYS office[s] will get their full salary and their convention paychecks at the same time. That’s double dipping for hundreds of politicians. Delegates get paid every year, for unlimited years. Plus, they can hire family members and cronies for their staffs, and pay them, too. Delegates don’t have to accomplish anything to be paid. Sort of sounds like a politician, doesn’t it?
At the last convention in 1967, 4 of 5 delegates were Albany insiders. No person can seriously expect a convention of Albany insiders to take on Albany’s culture of corruption. They never have. Voting NO stops greed, corruption and insider politics.
At least $350 million in taxpayer dollars will be spent on a Constitution Convention. Delegates will pocket $80,000 each! Delegates who hold NYS office[s] will get their full salary and their convention paychecks at the same time. That’s double dipping for hundreds of politicians. Delegates get paid every year, for unlimited years. Plus, they can hire family members and cronies for their staffs, and pay them, too. Delegates don’t have to accomplish anything to be paid. Sort of sounds like a politician, doesn’t it?
At the last convention in 1967, 4 of 5 delegates were Albany insiders. No person can seriously expect a convention of Albany insiders to take on Albany’s culture of corruption. They never have. Voting NO stops greed, corruption and insider politics.
The NYS Constitution can be changed at ANY time through amendments. There is no need for a long, costly, inefficient convention. The Constitution has been amended over 200 times since 1894. After the last Convention in 1967, voters rejected every single change that the delegates proposed. After spending tens of millions of dollars, the convention accomplished nothing! Voting NO stops waste and inefficiency.
Here
are some of the changes wanted:
Article 5 protects cops, paid firefighters, nurses, and other
first responders by guaranteeing the retirement safety they’ve earned on our
streets. PBA’s and NYSP reject the Constitutional Convention. NYSPFFA, the
statewide firefighters organization rejects the Constitutional Convention.
NYSNA, the statewide nurses organization rejects the Con Con. UEMSO, the
statewide EMS organization rejects the Con Con.
Article 14 promises places like the Catskills and Adirondacks “shall be forever kept as wild forest lands.” Constitutional Convention would expose lands to clear cut logging, hyrdro-fracking, and development. Sierra Club, Food and Water Watch, Adirondack Council, Friends of the Forest, Protect the Adirondacks, Environmental Advocates of NY, ADK Mountain Club - these are just some of the environmental groups that oppose Con Con. Voting NO on Con Con would preserve wildlife, trees, parks, and open space.
Article 11 guarantees all children the right to free public education. Advocates of vouchers, religious schools, privatization, and charter schools want a Con Con so they can diminish our constitutional right to public schools. One of the changes adopted at the last convention in 1967 allowed public monies to be used to pay for religious schools. If voters hadn’t rejected it, our entire public education system would have changed drastically.
Article 5 protects teachers’ safe retirement after decades of
service to children. Voting NO to Con Con will defend kids, public schools and
teachers.
Article 17 protects the vulnerable by guaranteeing the “aid, care and support of the needy.” Mental health, public health, SNAP, veterans’ services, HEAP and elder care are just some of the programs operated under the umbrella of Article 17. Voting NO on Con Con shields the vulnerable.
Article 1 promises that labor, like electricians, steelworkers and plumbers, can form unions. Right-to-work predators want to use the Con Con to turn NY into an anti-worker state like Wisconsin or Alabama. Article 1 guarantees workers comp for people injured in the job. AFL-CIO, CSEA, NYSUT, IBEW, and unions across the state oppose Con Con. Voting No on a Con Con is standing for working people.
In addition to all the organizations noted above, here are just a few more of the 100-plus coalition partners that have formed New Yorkers Against Corruption to oppose the Con Con:
LEFT: Working Families Party, Equality NY, Planned Parenthood, NAACP, LGBT
RIGHT: Conservative Party, Council of Churches, NYS Rifle & Pistol Association, NYS Right to Life, NYS Republican Party. Voting NO to a Con Con will sustain political diversity.
An informed voting decision and an informed and engaged voting electorate is the key to making changes to New York, Westchester County and the Town. This is not the only information about the Constitutional Convention and we encourage our readers to research and learn more before Election Day. Do we really want our current crop of politicians, who have made us the highest taxed, highest regulated and highest intrusion into everything we do the stewards of changing their own bad behavior? We hope not. Regardless of your position, we encourage you to vote. Only then will we see A Better Greenburgh.
Labels:
Albany,
Constitutional Convention,
corrupt,
corruption,
GameOn 365,
insiders,
Juettner,
Ken Jones,
Morgan,
Paul Feiner,
referendum,
Sheehan
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)