Sunday, January 21, 2018

Leadership Remains Stale as Ideas and Creative Thinking Wither

As the Shelbourne assisted living saga continues to drag out with both sides knowing the probable outcome after all of the lawsuits, we’re faced with other construction proposals elsewhere. By the time the public learns of these other projects, we usually uncover that Mr Feiner has had secret meetings with them long before the breath of public knowledge. They pitch their ideas in the corner office, seeking help, advice and strategies. Such was the case with GameOn 365, friends of Mr Feiner who would be positioned by him for a windfall property gain at 715 Dobbs Ferry Road, the former Frank’s Nursery property. Regardless of the tactics employed by Mr Feiner, the neighborhoods surrounding the property were able to beat him at his own game, stood united and thwarted the illegal deal he made with them.

Now we have the Shelbourne assisted living proposal that has already visited the halls of justice. Mr Feiner openly stated he was for the assisted living facility before the Edgemont community protested and then he was against it. It also appears that Mr Sheehan has publicly stated he is against the variances that were granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals. You may also recall Mr Sheehan chaired the questionably received Town Comprehensive Plan, making it nothing more than a weak politically correct statement of current events – none of which can be certified scientifically – and not a vision for the Town’s future. It was a golden opportunity whose capital was squandered away for a brief moment of political acknowledgement. Sadly, this seems to be what our past 25 years of stale leadership is providing the Town. If misery loves company, we’ll not alone.


After some 20-years of dormancy, the former General Motors assembly plant site in Sleepy Hollow, seems poised to begin construction of the Edge-on-Hudson mega-development. After completing remediation (none of which Town Attorney Tim Lewis offered to provide estimates for) the below-ground infrastructure needs were addressed. With that completed, vertical construction should finally proceed at an estimated $1billion cost. It is a joint venture between two developers, SunCal of California and Diversified Realty Advisors of Montvale, New Jersey. But what are they proposing to build at the end of Beekman Avenue that Toll Brothers, a Pennsylvania company, will be constructing?

Once again, this mega-development will include 1,177 units of condominiums, townhouses and rental apartments; a 140-room boutique hotel; 135,000 square feet of retail space and 35,000 square feet of office space. This proposal has the hallmarks of touching every issue for any community that entertains a developer’s vision: increased traffic, flooding, increased school enrollment, increased emergency services call volume for police, fire and ambulance, the need for more parking, bus and taxi services, undersized roadways and traffic systems to name a few. They’ll also include millennial favorites such as a state-of-the-art exercise facility, a pool, community room and a coffee shop. There will be limited parking as the developers will insist these same millennials do not drive – usually disproved as the sales and rentals steadily increase. How long will it take before we start seeing For Rent signs in these new vacant retail spaces that becomes the status quo?

Every developer we’ve ever listened to provides a traffic study after their initial proposal utilizing the state’s figures for the size of the development. What it doesn’t account for is the fact that Sleepy Hollow, like all of the other river towns, can only have 180 degrees of access as it has the Hudson River utilizing the other 180 degrees of that travel circle, effectively halving their span of attraction, a factor that all river town businesses suffer from. Consequently, Edge of Hudson begins its struggle with a half-capacity for traffic relief right out of the gate. But, not to worry – millennials don’t own cars or drive. Regardless, the traffic study will reflect what the developer needs it to be: a marginal increase in traffic during the 7am through 9am and the 4pm through 6pm rush hour periods.


Most of the developments nowadays appear to have first floor retail space on most, if not all of their ground floor buildings. Why stay with this staid and non-functioning model if brick-and-mortar retail is dying? It’s simply because first floor units are the least desirable to live in. Hence, the use of the old standby for retail space. So more coffee shops, nail salons, dry cleaners, Subway-like fast food businesses and dollar stores. It’s absurd! Yet community leaders will continue to discuss the changing landscape of retail – while having absolutely no experience or direct knowledge of running a business for profit – and tell us how the internet is changing the shopping paradigm. With this being the case, shouldn’t we look for a different and more viable plan? Of course we should.

The office space seems like a fairly innocuous offering. Are zoning changes being made to accommodate these retail and business inclusions into this residential housing? Are they really necessary? While 35,000 square feet isn’t that great a space, what happens to it if it cannot be rented out? And what of the hotel that will be constructed on the property? What will be the daily impact of its operation to the area? Will traffic conditions affect the flow of traffic in just Sleepy Hollow or will it also attack Tarrytown, Elmsford, Pocantico Hills, Scarborough, etc.? We’ve been told repeatedly that millennials don’t drive. I
f they do own a car will they drive their cars back and forth to work? Will the hotel have customers walking to them or only taking their shuttle from outer points because it doesn’t allow or have enough parking? Will there be docks that boaters can use? If there are, who will oversee them?

This project isn’t in Greenburgh per se. However every project done in one location can be easily cannibalized and imported to another. Just look at the Shelbourne project on the heels of the Brightview assisted living monstrosity that was inflicted at Benedict Avenue and Rt 119. If it happens in one neighborhood, it can happen in yours. A true Comprehensive Plan could have spared us this type of real estate debauchery. Instead, we were given platitudes about global warming and 500-year storms that are happening every year. This stale thinking needs to change – everywhere. But it needs to start here and then be moved to other neighborhoods just like the bad developments have. Only then can we get A Better Greenburgh.

2 comments:

  1. "Stupid is as stupid does", sound familiar? Stupid here would be the conclusion that having ground floor retail is the antithesis to "for rent" signs offering retail space on area commercial roadways. Like ignoring the effect of having new 1,177 units of residential space insuring at least 1,177+ inhabitants in need of goods and services preferably onsite. ABG, wake up and smell the onsite coffee; such retail is a selling point for the project, not a deterrent. Sleepy Hollow, aptly named, stakes no claim to a vast supply competitive retail and what's so bad about not having to get into a car (driverless or not) to drop off or pick up dry cleaning or an onsite purchase of that troubling cup of joe? And assuredly, were this project not providing an insular market for brick and mortar commerce, there would be no retail space takers which would harm, not the public, but the Developers -- so why is ABG concerned? Ground floor space normally fetches more rent than residential use and if living on the ground floor were such a luxe hope, that the rounding error of what could be but is not ground floor residential (re 1,177) use should be an argument advanced only by those would be tenants seeking "ranch" house layouts.

    As for the dreaded "cannibalization", it applies not only to developments but also to those criticizing them. Such prejudice commands a rendition of "if wishes were horses,then beggars would ride". Would ABG prefer a new industrial assembly plant on the land. What is proposed is really a new town, nearly self-contained and one that will pay considerable taxes most of which will go toward its own upkeep drawing less upon municipal services...perhaps. It is likely that private garbage carting service, private security and private snowplowing, etc. will reduce the drawdown of Sleepy Hollow civil servants. And yes, proximity to Hudson River views will be the calling card of all river towns now and in the future.

    Irrational fears aside, perhaps ABG would do better were it to worry less about ABSH and return to Greenburgh proper where its home town suffers from 25 years of "headless" leadership.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Samis for Supervisor. "Leadership?" More like the circus where the clown board holds court. Now we learn they are ready to sell their souls for 14 free acres in der Ferinerland at the old Elmwood Country Club to let a developer build 55 years and older and over housing - the last thing the aging GC school district needs. No one under 19 allowed. Raus! And then there is the fantasy of having these town house condos assessed at full value. Fat chance. Not happening no matter how many times the supervisor bleats out "win win" and "no cost to the town." No wonder Abinanti has not called the clown board back - he knows this plan is DOA in Albany.

    ReplyDelete